Find more information about: ISBN: 039 OCLC Number: 551692471 Notes: Vol. 4: published by Andi Offset.
Reproduction Notes: Electronic reproduction. S.l.: HathiTrust Digital Library, 2010. MiAaHDL Description: 1 online resource (volumes ) Details: Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. Contents: seri 1.
Pendekatan melalui metafisika, logika dan etika - seri 2. Pendekatan melalui sejarah dan pelaksanaannya - seri 4. Filsafat sosial dan politik Pancasila. Responsibility: oleh H.
Banyak orang menilai bicara filsafat identik dengan pembicaraan yang rumit dan mengada-ada. Bahkan sebagian meragukan manfaat filsafat. Buku ini mencoba memaparkan perjalanan filsafat dari masa ke masa dengan menunjukkan pemikiran-pemikiran mendasar dari para filsuf yang berpengaruh pada zamannya, baik yang saling melengkapi maupun yang saling bertentangan. Buku Filsafat Banyak orang menilai bicara filsafat identik dengan pembicaraan yang rumit dan mengada-ada. Bahkan sebagian meragukan manfaat filsafat. Buku ini mencoba memaparkan perjalanan filsafat dari masa ke masa dengan menunjukkan pemikiran-pemikiran mendasar dari para filsuf yang berpengaruh pada zamannya, baik yang saling melengkapi maupun yang saling bertentangan.
Buku Filsafat untuk Pemula ini ditulis dengan gaya yang unik untuk mengantar siapa pun yang merasa awam ke pintu masuk dunia filsafat. A relatively short (180 page) comic book covering the history of Philosophy. I've picked up 'I am a strange loop' again and they've been sort of fun in combination. I think I'd like more from this series - it declares itself to be a 'writers and readers beginners documentary comic book.' There are a whole lot of philosophers in the series, and some other works I might be interested in - the UN, Islam, Buddha, and of course.
The History of Clowns. For beginners. I'd like to have a beer with th A relatively short (180 page) comic book covering the history of Philosophy. I've picked up 'I am a strange loop' again and they've been sort of fun in combination. I think I'd like more from this series - it declares itself to be a 'writers and readers beginners documentary comic book.'
There are a whole lot of philosophers in the series, and some other works I might be interested in - the UN, Islam, Buddha, and of course. The History of Clowns. For beginners. I'd like to have a beer with the publishing staff. They sound odd. I miss comic books. Maybe I'll get some French graphic novels, see if that helps me.
I used to think graphic novels were the best way to influence the world - and that was before every Marvel character became a movie. Anyway, back to this book - it's good.
Obviously impossible task, but they do a good job with it. I guess they could have done a little bit better job trying to remind you of the overall picture, the map - a big chart (or lots of little charts) of who influenced who would have been a good use of the medium. They did talk a lot about that, but I could have used more.
But the exposition of the basic feel and thoughts of these folks, good and bad (the misogyny of many of the 19th century folks is highlighted, for example) is really quite good. Menurut saya kekuatan buku ini terletak pada niat sang pengarang, Richard Osborne, untuk benar-benar memperkenalkan filsafat terutama pada orang awam samasekali. Seluruh aspek yang bisa dikaji dari sebuah bahasan filsafat, dipaparkan dalam kerangka 5W+1H (who, what, where, when, why + how), dengan kemasan menarik dan informatif.
Yang saya maksud adalah, bagaimana sebuah sejarah panjang benturan pemikiran-pemikiran kritis selama peradaban manusia disajikan dalam potongan-potongan stripping komika Menurut saya kekuatan buku ini terletak pada niat sang pengarang, Richard Osborne, untuk benar-benar memperkenalkan filsafat terutama pada orang awam samasekali. Seluruh aspek yang bisa dikaji dari sebuah bahasan filsafat, dipaparkan dalam kerangka 5W+1H (who, what, where, when, why + how), dengan kemasan menarik dan informatif. Yang saya maksud adalah, bagaimana sebuah sejarah panjang benturan pemikiran-pemikiran kritis selama peradaban manusia disajikan dalam potongan-potongan stripping komikal. Begitu pula dengan jargon-jargon penting dunia filsafat, disajikan lewat balon-balon percakapan antara karikatur tokoh, khas komik. Pula tersaji berbagai infografis mengenai perkembangan ilmu nalar ini, masih dalam sajian komikal. Secara umum pembaca akan digiring untuk mengenal jalan panjang filsafat, mulai dari masa klasik, renaissance, sampai Buku ini bisa jadi sebuah gerbang populer untuk masyarakat awam yang punya seberkas niat memasuki dunia 'antah berantah' yang dinamai filsafat.
I admit that sometimes I'm willing to start with the elementary textbook, if I really want to learn something. The cool thing about the '.for Beginners' series is that the comic-book style never made me feel dumb, and the books within it are usually funny, too. Hey, chalk it up to the graphic-novel craze, and run out and buy a few. They have 'Freud for Beginners,' and 'Judaism for Beginners' and 'Sex for Beginners.' (But you'll probably want to pick up the latter just before Books-a-Million cl I admit that sometimes I'm willing to start with the elementary textbook, if I really want to learn something. The cool thing about the '.for Beginners' series is that the comic-book style never made me feel dumb, and the books within it are usually funny, too.
Hey, chalk it up to the graphic-novel craze, and run out and buy a few. They have 'Freud for Beginners,' and 'Judaism for Beginners' and 'Sex for Beginners.' (But you'll probably want to pick up the latter just before Books-a-Million closes for the evening. And don't look the cashier in the eye.) However, as soon as someone starts trying to simplify philosophy, that person will inevitably run into more (not fewer) arguments. Filsafat dalam bahasa Yunani berarti “Cinta akan kebijaksanaan”. Meski demikian pengertian filsafat sendiri masih simpang siur dan berbedabeda antara satu pakar dengan pakar lainnya.
Buku ini memuat sejarah perjalanan filsafat dalam kehidupan manusia, mulai dari jaman Yunani, jaman Romawi, jaman Kristianitas awal, Jaman Pencerahan, sampai dengan filsafat abad 20. Beberapa filosof yang banyak dikupas di buku ini antara lain Plato, Aristoteles, Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Hegel, Immanuel Kant,dll. A Filsafat dalam bahasa Yunani berarti “Cinta akan kebijaksanaan”. Meski demikian pengertian filsafat sendiri masih simpang siur dan berbedabeda antara satu pakar dengan pakar lainnya.
Buku ini memuat sejarah perjalanan filsafat dalam kehidupan manusia, mulai dari jaman Yunani, jaman Romawi, jaman Kristianitas awal, Jaman Pencerahan, sampai dengan filsafat abad 20. Beberapa filosof yang banyak dikupas di buku ini antara lain Plato, Aristoteles, Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Hegel, Immanuel Kant,dll. Aliran filsafat yang dibahas dalam ini juga beragam seperti Stoa, empirisme, rasionalisme, Eklektisme, Strukturalisme, Eksistensialisme, Materialisme, Utilitarianisme, Pragmatisme, Positivisme dll., Jika filsafat pada awalnya banyak berkaitan dengan matematika, astronomi, agama maupun etika, dalam perkembangannya filsafat juga merasuk ke dunia politik. Kalau filsafat politik Yunani menekankan manusia sebagai mahluk komunal dalam negara, filsafat abad pertengahan menekankan pada peranan negara dan sintesis Kristiani dan filsafat modern menekankan pada invidu dan negara. Bagi saya, buku ini menarik meski ada beberapa kelemahan yakni (1) bahasa yang dipergunakan agak kaku. The edition I purchased may be at fault, but the book I read was riddled with grammatical errors, missing or misplaced punctuation, run-on sentences, etc. This is a shame since many parts of the book are helpful for beginners.
Many parts are of five-star quality. The errors themselves brought the rating down to a two, but I bumped it up to three stars due to the content. Be sure to check what edition you purchase. I can recommend the sections on Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Locke, Sp A mixed bag. The edition I purchased may be at fault, but the book I read was riddled with grammatical errors, missing or misplaced punctuation, run-on sentences, etc. This is a shame since many parts of the book are helpful for beginners. Many parts are of five-star quality.
The errors themselves brought the rating down to a two, but I bumped it up to three stars due to the content. Be sure to check what edition you purchase. I can recommend the sections on Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Locke, Spinoza, Leibniz, Kant, Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, and Nietzsche.
Though not comprehensive, they are readable introductions to these philosophers' thought. The book is quite lacking with regard to early Christian thinkers and medieval philosophers, particularly Aquinas and Anselm. The authors displayed some bias against Christian philosophers in places.
The sections on Hobbes and Hume also could've used more depth. The book's discussion of 20th-century philosophy, including existentialism, structuralism, and post-structuralism, lacked clarity, though the obscurity of these ideas may be traceable to the ideas themselves.
The comic style is sometimes helpful in distilling complex ideas into understandable parts, though its success is a bit hit or miss. As someone who rarely reads graphic novels, I found the style to be confusing at times. A much better graphic-novel introduction to modern thought is Steven Nadler's 'Heretics!'
, even if it is more limited in scope. Overall, I recommend it, though it can be lacking in intellectual rigor, and some sections are more appropriate for older high school students and general readers than undergraduate or graduate students. Just be wary of the editions that may be poorly edited or proofread. A comprehensive, 'cartoony' history of philosophy, this book serves as an approachable introduction for beginners or a fun review for experienced readers of philosophy.
Osborne includes historical contexts and many minor figures along the way. Osborne does not always accurately portray Christian theology. For instance, he claims that Paul the Apostle 'saved Christianity from dying out' by combining 'it with Greek philosophy' (p. But Paul and early Christianity opposed Greek philosophy; see A A comprehensive, 'cartoony' history of philosophy, this book serves as an approachable introduction for beginners or a fun review for experienced readers of philosophy. Osborne includes historical contexts and many minor figures along the way. Osborne does not always accurately portray Christian theology.
For instance, he claims that Paul the Apostle 'saved Christianity from dying out' by combining 'it with Greek philosophy' (p. But Paul and early Christianity opposed Greek philosophy; see Acts 17:16-33, 1 Corinthians 1:18-2:16, 1 Corinthians 15, and Colossians 2:8.
Later church fathers used Greek philosophy to more clearly express Christian theology from the Bible; but Christianity was no syncretism. Ideas may overlap in multiple worldviews.
“Buku ini membuka jalan untuk semakin mencakupkan pemikiran Nietzsche ke dalam gerakan-gerakan protes. Ia membawa Nietzsche keluar dari dunia akademik menuju ke jalanan” — Jurnal Ephemera Mengaitkan filsafat Nietzsche dengan anarkisme barangkali terdengar mengejutkan, terutama karena Nietzsche sendiri mengutuk amat keras pandangan politik sama rata sama rasa baik yang dianut “Buku ini membuka jalan untuk semakin mencakupkan pemikiran Nietzsche ke dalam gerakan-gerakan protes. Ia membawa Nietzsche keluar dari dunia akademik menuju ke jalanan” — Jurnal Ephemera Mengaitkan filsafat Nietzsche dengan anarkisme barangkali terdengar mengejutkan, terutama karena Nietzsche sendiri mengutuk amat keras pandangan politik sama rata sama rasa baik yang dianut oleh anarkisme maupun sosialisme.
Namun demikian, ada pokok-pokok kesesuaian tertentu antara filsafat Nietzsche dan anarkisme, terutama karena keduanya sama-sama antisistem dan mengusung visi transformasi sosial radikal. Ide berfilsafat dengan godam dan transvaluasi segala nilai yang diusung Nietzsche jelas merupakan komponen integral dari proyek politik anarkisme, yakni penghapusan segala bentuk kuasa, kontrol, dan paksaan. Kumpulan esai ini berusaha mengkaji kaitan historis, politik, dan filosofis antara pemikiran transgresif Nietzsche dan visi politik anarkisme. I would really like to give this book a higher rating, both because of my affinity with its stated intentions, and also because John Moore (who died prior to its completion) is wonderful and this could have been a perfect concluding note to his contributions to anarchist thought. That being said, a lot of the essays were extremely dry and overly academic.
For those pieces, the task of reconciling Nietzsche with the anarchist tradition amounted to a ideological pursuit of making a venn diagram of I would really like to give this book a higher rating, both because of my affinity with its stated intentions, and also because John Moore (who died prior to its completion) is wonderful and this could have been a perfect concluding note to his contributions to anarchist thought. That being said, a lot of the essays were extremely dry and overly academic. For those pieces, the task of reconciling Nietzsche with the anarchist tradition amounted to a ideological pursuit of making a venn diagram of ideas.
In that way, those essays have more in common with the other academic appropriations of Nietzsche that they would purport to oppose. Of the more academic pieces, the one Leigh Starcross was worthwhile because its goal, to attempt to reconstruct the pieces of Emma Goldman's long lost Nietzsche lectures, is relevant to my interests. Besides that, all of the stars are earned by the pieces by Max Cafard, Peter Lamborn Wilson and John Moore, who approach Nietzsche's working as a provocation and a jumping off point into questions of life and death, the materiality of the spirit, entheogens, and art as life. I also appreciated the tribute to John Moore at the beginning, as I think he is a writer who deserves a lot more recognition and uptake among contemporary readers. If the book had consisted only of these four or five bits, it would be a 5 star book. 'In Turin in 1889 Nietzsche saw a coachman flogging a horse, rushed forward, and threw his arms around the beast to protect it - then fainted. Sinhala fonts free download. When eh awoke he wrote the Last Insane Letters.
These absurd images have the crude surrealistic power of a messianic moment - suitable for post-millennial stained glass, or a 'shrine of the book'. Nietzsche's recurrent modernity reveals him as prophet, saint. And as a modern scripture Nietzsche's Last Letters must of course be crazy.' - Peter Lamborn Wilson, 'Crazy Nietzsche'. This book is a mix of downright terrible essays and great pieces of writing. As for the poorly-done, I want to believe some of it is the fault of translators.
Filsafat Politik Plato
In particular, the 'Death of God' essay is almost unreadable, patched together by sentence fragments and practically undecipherable concepts. A couple other pieces weren't terrible, but a little boring or uninteresting. I really appreciated some of the final essays, especially the pieces by Saul Newman and John Moore.
Both of these highlight This book is a mix of downright terrible essays and great pieces of writing. As for the poorly-done, I want to believe some of it is the fault of translators. In particular, the 'Death of God' essay is almost unreadable, patched together by sentence fragments and practically undecipherable concepts. A couple other pieces weren't terrible, but a little boring or uninteresting. I really appreciated some of the final essays, especially the pieces by Saul Newman and John Moore. Both of these highlight in different ways the importance of Nietzsche's thought to anarchists. In the Newman piece, he makes it clear how classical anarchist thought is a politics of ressentiment, but shows how individualist strains of anarchism break out of this bind.
I feel like this piece opens the door for anarchist thought that isn't reliant upon inverted moral codes. The John Moore piece takes Nietzsche's writing-as-attentat as a point of departure in order to discuss how art can serve as a means toward a Dionysian way of life (anarchy) as long as we also recognize how it can confine us. In other words, it too must be destroyed in the end. The bad parts were pretty bad, but the good pieces were worth reading, and I'm wanting to be generous to this book. Ada korelasi antara filsafat Nietzsche dan tradisi anarkhisme, kurang lebih pesan itu yang ingi disampaikan buku ini. Filsafat Nietzsche sendiri meskipun sulit untuk dipahami, jika boleh saya simpulkan salah satunya adalah adanya penghargaan terhadap keberagaman dalam hidup.
Filsafat Hukum
Dalam pandangan anarkhisme, tujuan akhirnya adalah juga penghargaan keberagaman dalam hidup, tanpa ada yang ditindas dan menindas. Salah satu kesamaan lain dari filsafat Nietzsche dan Anarkhisme adalah keduanya sam sama anti Ada korelasi antara filsafat Nietzsche dan tradisi anarkhisme, kurang lebih pesan itu yang ingi disampaikan buku ini.
Filsafat Nietzsche sendiri meskipun sulit untuk dipahami, jika boleh saya simpulkan salah satunya adalah adanya penghargaan terhadap keberagaman dalam hidup. Dalam pandangan anarkhisme, tujuan akhirnya adalah juga penghargaan keberagaman dalam hidup, tanpa ada yang ditindas dan menindas. Salah satu kesamaan lain dari filsafat Nietzsche dan Anarkhisme adalah keduanya sam sama anti sistem dan negara.
Menurut Nietzsche dalam bukunya Beyond Good and Evil 'negara itu sepeti monster yang dingin', dan menurut anarkhisme negara tidak lebih dari mesin penindas. Dalam buku ini juga dijelaskan perbedaan Anarkisme dan Marxisme, karena sekilas Anarkhisme yang dipelopori oleh Bakunin dan Marxisme yang dipelopori Marx memiliki persamaan, yaitu sama sama menginginkan masyarakat yang egaliter (setara). Akan tetapi kedua aliran ini memiliki pandangan yang berbeda terhadap negara.
Dalam pandangan Marxisme negara tidak bisa lepas dari yang namanya kelas borjuis, negara tidak independen, dan negara merupakan representasi dari relasi kelas borjuis. Tititk tolak pandangan Marxis masih bertumpu pada bidang ekonomi, khususnya produksi. Dalam pandangan Anarkisme negara itu bersifat independen, tidak bisa diintervesi oleh kelas borjuis sekalipun dan relasiborjuis merupakan representasi dari negara. Pandangan anarkisme berankgkat dari politik.
I've been quite intrigued by this book for a long while. It seemed both a noble cause and great challenge to connect Nietzschean thought to anarchists.
However there is a lot of overlap worth considering. The selection of essays however left much to be desired. The book was overwhelmingly academic, overwhelmingly male and not particularly readable. Certain essays were fantastic whilst others were having to strech quite a bit to make their thesis work. I agree with the intent of this book wholehe I've been quite intrigued by this book for a long while. It seemed both a noble cause and great challenge to connect Nietzschean thought to anarchists. However there is a lot of overlap worth considering.
The selection of essays however left much to be desired. The book was overwhelmingly academic, overwhelmingly male and not particularly readable. Certain essays were fantastic whilst others were having to strech quite a bit to make their thesis work. I agree with the intent of this book wholeheartedly.
For too long the popular interpretation of Nietzsche is that he is reactionary. But like Max Stirner before him, his ideas attacked both left and right in an attempt at transcendence for the self. If anything read the essay about Emma Goldman's defense of Nietzsche, it was a nice historical backgrounder.
This was, overall, a very good collection that includes a very wide variety of perspectives on Nietzsche's relevance to anarchism. Some contributions are deep; others, relatively shallow; some, political; others, more philosophical; some defend Nietzsche at the expense of the anarchist tradition; others, the reverse. But, sadly, I'll remember this book mostly by its two worst contributions (both translated from italian), one of which I literally could make no sense at all, and the other was only This was, overall, a very good collection that includes a very wide variety of perspectives on Nietzsche's relevance to anarchism. Some contributions are deep; others, relatively shallow; some, political; others, more philosophical; some defend Nietzsche at the expense of the anarchist tradition; others, the reverse. But, sadly, I'll remember this book mostly by its two worst contributions (both translated from italian), one of which I literally could make no sense at all, and the other was only decent by comparison. I highly recommend this book to devotees of Nietzsche, but encourage you to skim or skip the two articles just mentioned.
Michael Hardt berbicara di Michael Hardt (lahir 1960) adalah dan Amerika Serikat. Herdt dikenal sebagai penulis buku, which was co-written with. Buku ini disebut-sebut sebagai ' Abad ke-21'. Hardt dan Negri berpendapat bahwa beberapa kekuatan yang mereka anggap mendominasi kehidupan sehari-hari, seperti, dan (atau produksi berefek), memiliki potensi untuk memicu perubahan sosial dalam dimensi yang tak terbayangkan. Sekuelnya, diterbitkan bulan Agustus 2004. Buku ini menegaskan ide yang diusung Empire, yaitu adalah kelompok yang berpotensi menciptakan gerakan demokrasi di tingkat global. Buku ketiga sekaligus yang terakhir, diterbitkan tahun 2009.
Daftar isi. Karya Buku.
Gilles Deleuze: an Apprenticeship in Philosophy, 1993. Labor of Dionysus: a Critique of the State-form, bersama, 1994., bersama Antonio Negri, 2000., bersama Antonio Negri, 2004., bersama Antonio Negri, 2009., bersama Antonio Negri, 2012 Artikel. 'The Withering of Civil Society'.
'Prison Time'. 'Affective Labor'. 26 (2): 89–100.
Film., April 2011., 87 mnt., 2008. Referensi.